The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 1085-1093, June 2012

The Influence of Sterilization Method on Articular Surface Damage of Retrieved Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts

  • Matthew T. Greulich, MD

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
  • ,
  • Marcel E. Roy, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Missouri Bone & Joint Research Foundation, St Louis, Missouri
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Marcel E. Roy, PhD, Missouri Bone & Joint Research Foundation, 1000 Des Peres Rd, Suite 150, St Louis, MO 63131.
  • ,
  • Leo A. Whiteside, MD

      Affiliations

    • Missouri Bone & Joint Research Foundation, St Louis, Missouri
    • Signal Medical Corp, St Louis, Missouri

Received 17 January 2011; accepted 24 October 2011. published online 19 December 2011.

Abstract 

This observational study was designed to determine the importance of sterilization method and insert thickness as predictors of articular damage of cruciate-retaining polyethylene components used in total knee arthroplasty. Ninety-nine explanted tibial inserts were evaluated for surface damage. Severe damage modes were observed in 36 of 52 of γ-irradiated inserts but none of those sterilized by ethylene oxide. Articular damage significantly correlated to time in vivo but not to insert thickness. Inserts sterilized by ethylene oxide gas in gas-permeable packaging exhibited a significantly lower damage accumulation rate compared with inserts sterilized by γ radiation and stored in air or an inert environment. γ irradiation and storage in argon instead of air reduced the frequency of severe damage such as delamination but not the overall damage rate.

Keywords: knee, total knee arthroplasty, polyethylene, retrieval, sterilization method

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding for this project was provided by the Missouri Bone & Joint Research Foundation.

 Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research. No protected health information, as defined by HIPAA, was recorded for this study.

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.023.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00572-9

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.023

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 1085-1093, June 2012