Repeat 2-Stage Exchange for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty:
A Viable Option?
Abstract
We investigated whether performing a repeat 2-stage exchange eradicates infection in patients who previously underwent 2-stage treatment for an infected total hip arthroplasty. We identified 15 patients who had failed a 2-stage total hip arthroplasty and underwent a planned repeat 2-stage between 2000 and 2009. Of the 15 patients, 8 were treated with a complete 2-stage procedure, whereas the remaining 7 patients were treated only with a first-stage resection of the infected implant. Of the 8 patients who underwent complete 2-stage exchange, 1 died because of in-hospital complications, and 1 had a recurrent infection. Repeat infection is highly associated with resistant organisms, obesity, and poor patient health. Of the 7 patients who underwent resection without reimplantation, 3 had a recurrent infection. Our data suggest that if infection can be adequately controlled after repeat resection of the joint prosthesis, reimplantation is a reasonable option.
Keywords: periprosthetic joint infection, total hip arthroplasty, recurrent PJI, repeat 2-stage, 2-stage exchange hip arthroplasty
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.
The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/arth.2011.11.006.
PII: S0883-5403(11)00630-9
doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.006
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
