« BackThe Journal of Arthroplasty
Article in Press

Bipolar Sealing in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection:

Efficacy and Cost Analysis

  • R. Carter Clement, BSE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Atul F. Kamath, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Gwo-Chin Lee, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, 1 Cupp, 39th and Market Sts, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
  • ,
  • Peter B. Derman, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Jonathan P. Garino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Pennsylvania Orthopedic Center, 491 John Young Way, Exton, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Gwo-Chin Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Received 1 September 2011; accepted 11 November 2011. published online 24 January 2012.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Saline-coupled bipolar sealing has shown mixed results in primary arthroplasty. However, this technology has not been studied in infected revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), where morbidity is higher and conventional methods of blood management, such as cell salvage, often cannot be used. This case-matched study of 76 consecutive revision THA for infection included an experimental bipolar sealing group and a control group of conventional electrocautery. Groups were matched for gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and surgery type. Total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative hemoglobin drop were significantly less in the experimental group. In addition, operative time was significantly shorter in the experimental group, which translated into gross savings approximately equal to the cost of the device. The decreases in total blood loss and perioperative hemoglobin decline, along with financial savings, may support the use of bipolar sealing in infected revision THA.

Keywords: blood management, revision total hip arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, surgical hemostasis, saline-coupled bipolar sealer, Aquamantys, infection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.016.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00652-8

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.016

« BackThe Journal of Arthroplasty