Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 27, ISSUE 8, P1437-1441, September 2012

Preoperative Knee Stiffness and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

  • Mitch Winemaker
    Affiliations
    Hamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Wael A. Rahman
    Affiliations
    Hamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Danielle Petruccelli
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Danielle Petruccelli, MLIS, Hamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 1C3.
    Affiliations
    Hamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Justin de Beer
    Affiliations
    Hamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 30, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.015

      Abstract

      A retrospective case-control study was conducted to evaluate 1-year total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes among preoperative stiff knees, range of motion (ROM) 80° or less, compared with nonstiff preoperative knees, ROM 100° or greater. A total of 134 stiff knee cases were compared with a matched cohort of 134 non–stiff knee controls. Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score change scores from baseline to 1 year were similar between the groups. Stiff knees experienced a significantly greater mean improvement in ROM from baseline to 1 year (30.8° ± 18.8°) as compared with nonstiff knees (1.1° ± 12.8°) (P < .0001). Although ultimate ROM of a TKA can be restricted secondary to preoperative stiffness, improvements in outcomes and ROM are not affected. We conclude that progression of stiffness should not in and of itself lead to earlier intervention of TKA in most cases.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ritter M.A.
        • Berend M.E.
        • Harty L.D.
        • et al.
        Predicting range of motion after revision total knee arthroplasty: clustering and log-linear regression analyses.
        J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 338
        • Ritter M.A.
        • Harty L.D.
        • Davis K.E.
        • et al.
        Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A: 1278
        • Parsley B.S.
        • Engh G.A.
        • Dwyer K.A.
        Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; : 204
        • Babis G.C.
        • Trousdale R.T.
        • Pagnano M.W.
        • et al.
        Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A: 1534
        • Kettelkamp D.B.
        • Johnson R.J.
        • Smidt G.L.
        • et al.
        An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52: 775
        • Laubenthal K.N.
        • Smidt G.L.
        • Kettelkamp D.B.
        A quantitative analysis of knee motion during activities of daily living.
        Phys Ther. 1972; 52: 34
        • McAuley J.P.
        • Harrer M.F.
        • Ammeen D.
        • et al.
        Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; : 203
        • Kim Y.H.
        • Kim J.S.
        Does TKA improve functional outcome and range of motion in patients with stiff knees?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467 ([Epub ahead of print 2008 Aug 20]): 1348
        • Montgomery III, W.H.
        • Insall J.N.
        • Haas S.B.
        • et al.
        Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.
        Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11: 20
        • Bhan S.
        • Malhotra R.
        • Kiran E.K.
        Comparison of total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 451: 87
        • Rajgopal A.
        • Ahuja N.
        • Dolai B.
        Total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.
        J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 585
        • Spicer D.D.
        • Curry J.I.
        • Pomeroy D.
        • et al.
        Range of motion after arthroplasty for the stiff osteoarthritic knee.
        J South Orthop Assoc. 2002; 11: 227
        • Khatri D.
        • Malhotra R.
        • Bhan S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of total knee arthroplasty in stiff knees and knees with good preoperative range of motion.
        J Knee Surg. 2009; 22: 305
        • Shi M.G.
        • Lü H.S.
        • Guan Z.P.
        Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty.
        Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006; 44: 1101
        • Insall J.N.
        • Dorr L.D.
        • Scott R.D.
        • et al.
        Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 248: 13
        • Dawson J.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Murray D.
        • et al.
        Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 63
        • Owens W.D.
        • Felts J.A.
        • Spitznagel E.L.
        ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings.
        Anesthesiology. 1978; 49: 239
        • Murray D.W.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Rogers K.
        • et al.
        The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 1010
        • Kelly M.A.
        • Clarke H.D.
        Stiffness and ankylosis in primary total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; : 68
        • Aglietti P.
        • Windsor R.E.
        • Buzzi R.
        • et al.
        Arthroplasty for the stiff or ankylosed knee.
        J Arthroplasty. 1989; 4: 1