Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 27, ISSUE 8, P1499-1506.e1, September 2012

The Reconstruction of Periprosthetic Pelvic Discontinuity

Published:February 10, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.017

      Abstract

      The surgical techniques and outcomes of acetabular reconstruction for periprosthetic pelvic discontinuity cases are reported. The mean time to surgery for 9 patients with acute pelvic discontinuity was 16.3 days, with 8 patients (88%) having posterior column plating and a porous metal acetabular cup. No cases required revision surgery, with a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 24-67 months). Of the 62 chronic pelvic discontinuity cases, 20 had an ilioischial cage, with a revision rate of 29%. There were 42 cup-cage reconstructions with an 8-year survivorship of 86.3%, with a mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 24-93 months). Stable reconstruction of chronic pelvic discontinuity was achievable by distraction using a cup-cage acetabular reconstruction; however, satisfactory stability of acute pelvic discontinuity was achieved with compression of the posterior column using screw augmentation of the acetabular shell supplemented by posterior column plating.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Berry D.J.
        • Lewallen D.G.
        • Hanssen A.D.
        • et al.
        Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 1692
        • Noordin S.
        • Duncan C.P.
        • Masri B.A.
        • et al.
        Pelvic dissociation in revision total hip arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment.
        Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59: 37
        • Kurtz S.
        • Mowat F.
        • Ong K.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1487
        • Lieberman J.R.
        Cemented femoral revision: lest we forget.
        J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 72
        • Iorio R.
        • Robb W.J.
        • Healy W.L.
        • et al.
        Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1598
      1. Karrholm J GG, Herberts P. The Swedish hip arthroplasty register, Annual report 2006. In. 2006

        • Gross A.E.
        • Goodman S.B.
        Rebuilding the skeleton: the intraoperative use of trabecular metal in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 91
        • Kosashvili Y.
        • Backstein D.
        • Safir O.
        • et al.
        Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 870
        • Ballester Alfaro J.J.
        • Sueiro Fernandez J.
        Trabecular Metal buttress augment and the trabecular metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity.
        Hip Int. 2010; 20: 119
        • Sporer S.M.
        • Paprosky W.G.
        Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.
        J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21: 87
        • DeBoer D.K.
        • Christie M.J.
        • Brinson M.F.
        • et al.
        Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 835
        • Paprosky W.
        • Sporer S.
        • O'Rourke M.R.
        The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 453: 183
        • Parikh S.N.
        • Kreder H.J.
        Pelvic reconstruction for massive acetabular insufficiency.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; : 217
        • Springer B.D.
        • Berry D.J.
        • Cabanela M.E.
        • et al.
        Early postoperative transverse pelvic fracture: a new complication related to revision arthroplasty with an uncemented cup.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 2626
        • Berry D.J.
        Identification and management of pelvic discontinuity.
        Orthopedics. 2001; 24: 881
        • Lakstein D.
        • Backstein D.J.
        • Safir O.
        • et al.
        Modified trochanteric slide for complex hip arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and complication rates.
        J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25: 363
        • Lakstein D.
        • Kosashvili Y.
        • Backstein D.
        • et al.
        Modified extended trochanteric osteotomy with preservation of posterior structures.
        Hip Int. 2010; 20: 102
        • Lakstein D.
        • Kosashvili Y.
        • Backstein D.
        • et al.
        Trochanteric slide osteotomy on previously osteotomized greater trochanters.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 1630
        • Schneeberger A.G.
        • Murphy S.B.
        • Ganz R.
        The trochanteric flip osteotomy.
        Oper Orthop Trauma. 1997; 9: 1
        • Goodman S.
        • Saastamoinen H.
        • Shasha N.
        • et al.
        Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 436
        • DeHart M.M.
        • Riley Jr, L.H.
        Nerve injuries in total hip arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999; 7: 101
        • Abitbol J.J.
        • Gendron D.
        • Laurin C.A.
        • et al.
        Gluteal nerve damage following total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis.
        J Arthroplasty. 1990; 5: 319
        • Wasielewski R.C.
        • Galat D.D.
        • Sheridan K.C.
        • et al.
        Acetabular anatomy and transacetabular screw fixation at the high hip center.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 438: 171
        • Lakstein D.
        • Backstein D.
        • Safir O.
        • et al.
        Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 2318
        • Berry D.J.
        Epidemiology: hip and knee.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 183
        • Stiehl J.B.
        • Saluja R.
        • Diener T.
        Reconstruction of major column defects and pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15: 849
        • Christie M.J.
        • Barrington S.A.
        • Brinson M.F.
        • et al.
        Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; : 216
        • Eggli S.
        • Muller C.
        • Ganz R.
        Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; : 136
        • Koster G.
        • Willert H.G.
        • Kohler H.P.
        • et al.
        An oblong revisioncup for large acetabular defects: design rationale and two- to seven-year follow-up.
        J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13: 559
        • Sporer S.M.
        • O'Rourke M.
        • Paprosky W.G.
        The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision.
        J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 79
        • Moed B.R.
        • McMichael J.C.
        Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1170
        • Moed B.R.
        • Carr S.E.
        • Watson J.T.
        Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; : 57
        • Bobyn J.D.
        • Poggie R.A.
        • Krygier J.J.
        • et al.
        Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A: 123
        • Issack P.S.
        • Nousiainen M.
        • Beksac B.
        • et al.
        Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009; 38: 550
        • Paprosky W.G.
        • O'Rourke M.
        • Sporer S.M.
        The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 216
        • Rosson J.
        • Schatzker J.
        The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74: 716
        • Carroll F.A.
        • Hoad-Reddick D.A.
        • Kerry R.M.
        • et al.
        The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 574
        • Bostrom M.P.
        • Lehman A.P.
        • Buly R.L.
        • et al.
        Acetabular revision with the contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 453: 188
        • Kerboull M.
        • Hamadouche M.
        • Kerboull L.
        The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 378: 155
        • Peters C.L.
        • Miller M.
        • Erickson J.
        • et al.
        Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component.
        J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(Suppl 2): 67
        • Lietman S.A.
        • Bhavnani K.
        The partial pelvic replacement cup in severe acetabular defects.
        Orthopedics. 2001; 24: 1131
      2. van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89-3:296-300