Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Higher Postoperative Morbidity Than Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis


      A total of 2235 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and 605 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties performed at 3 institutions over 5 years were reviewed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications between these groups. The overall risk of complications for patients undergoing TKA was 11.0%, compared with 4.3% for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P < .0001). Total knee arthroplasty was associated with increased rates of manipulation (odds ratio [OR], 13.0; P < .0001), transfusion (OR, 8.5; P = .036), intensive care unit admission (OR, 7.4; P = .049), discharge to a rehabilitation facility (OR, 5.2; P < .0001) and had longer hospital stays (mean, 3.3 vs 2.0 days; P < .0001). There was a trend toward an increased risk of deep infection (0.8% vs 0.2%, P = .13), readmission (4.2% vs 2.7%, P = .0795), thromboembolic events (1.0% vs 0.64%, P = .398), and any reoperation (1.4% vs 0.6%; P = .064). The increased risk of perioperative complications after TKA should be considered when counseling patients if they are an appropriate candidate for either procedure.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Labek G, Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. 93:3, 2011.

        • Ma H.M.
        Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 5
        • Ranawat C.S.
        Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; : 286
        • Ritter MAMeneghini R.M.
        Twenty-year survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25: 4
      2. Amin AK, Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study. 451:2006.

        • Laurencin C.T.
        Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; : 273
      3. Newman JH, Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. 80:5, 1998.

      4. Yang KY, Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty—early results of a matched-pair comparison. 44:11, 2003.

      5. Fisher DA, Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in the over 70 population. 33:9, 2010.

        • Lombardi Jr, A.V.
        Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 6
        • Ackroyd C.E.
        A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties.
        Ten-year survivorship. 2002; 84: 5
      6. Berger RA, Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. 87:5, 2005.

        • Murray D.W.
        The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 6
      7. Chtain F, Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. 90:1, 2004.

      8. Hang J, Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. 81:1, 2010.

        • Jrvenp J.
        The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients.
        Int Orthop. 2010; 34: 5
        • Oduwole K.O.
        Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement.
        Ir J Med Sci. 2010; 179: 3
      9. Robertsson O, Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. 70:2, 1999.

      10. LA V., Jr, Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? 467:6, 2009.

      11. Kozinn SC, Scott R, Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. 71:1, 1989.

      12. Pandit H, The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. 88:1, 2006.

      13. Charlson ME, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. 40:5, 1987.

      14. Dauty M, Which factors affect the duration of inpatient rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty in the absence of complications? 52:3, 2009.