New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Predicts Morbidity and Mortality in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Published:September 21, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.040

      Abstract

      Background

      While the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI) has been shown to predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, the 5-factor index has not been evaluated in this patient population. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of the mFI-5 as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

      Methods

      A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's database for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty between the years 2005 and 2016 was conducted. The 5-factor score, which includes the presence of comorbid diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status, was calculated for each patient. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between the mFI-5 and postoperative complications while controlling for demographic variables.

      Results

      One hundred forty thousand one hundred fifty-eight patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and 226,398 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were identified. After adjusting for demographic variables and comorbid conditions, logistic regression analyses revealed that the mFI-5 was a strong predictor for total complications, Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, septic shock, pulmonary embolism, postoperative dialysis, reintubation, and prolonged ventilator requirement), surgical site infections, readmission, and 30-day mortality (P < .001).

      Conclusions

      The mFI-5 is an independent predictor of postoperative complications including life-threatening medical complications, surgical site infections, hospital readmission, and 30-day mortality after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. This clinical tool can be used to identify high-risk surgical patients and guide preoperative counseling to optimize outcomes.

      Level of Evidence

      III.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and PersonalCorporate R&D Professionals
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Colby S.L.
        • Ortman J.M.
        Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060 (Current Population Reports, P25-1143).
        US Census Bureau, Washington, DC2015
        • Kurtz S.M.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Lau E.
        • Bozic K.J.
        Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 624-630https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00285
        • Ondeck N.T.
        • Bovonratwet P.
        • Ibe I.K.
        • Bohl D.D.
        • McLynn R.P.
        • Cui J.J.
        • et al.
        Discriminative ability for adverse outcomes after surgical management of hip fractures.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32: 231-237https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001140
        • Menendez M.E.
        • Ring D.
        A comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity measures to predict inpatient mortality after proximal humerus fracture.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: 488-493https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000380
        • Searle S.D.
        • Mitnitski A.
        • Gahbauer E.A.
        • Gill T.M.
        • Rockwood K.
        A standard procedure for creating a frailty index.
        BMC Geriatr. 2008; 8: 24https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24
        • Rockwood K.
        • Howlett S.E.
        • MacKnight C.
        • Beattie B.L.
        • Bergman H.
        • Hébert R.
        • et al.
        Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004; 59: 1310-1317
        • Velanovich V.
        • Antoine H.
        • Swartz A.
        • Peters D.
        • Rubinfeld I.
        Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database.
        J Surg Res. 2013; 183: 104-110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.021
        • Abt N.B.
        • Richmon J.D.
        • Koch W.M.
        • Eisele D.W.
        • Agrawal N.
        Assessment of the predictive value of the modified frailty index for Clavien-Dindo grade IV critical care complications in major head and neck cancer operations.
        JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 142: 658-664https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0707
        • Wachal B.
        • Johnson M.
        • Burchell A.
        • Sayles H.
        • Rieke K.
        • Lindau R.
        • et al.
        Association of modified frailty index score with perioperative risk for patients undergoing total laryngectomy.
        JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 143: 818-823https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0412
        • Chimukangara M.
        • Helm M.C.
        • Frelich M.J.
        • Bosler M.E.
        • Rein L.E.
        • Szabo A.
        • et al.
        A 5-item frailty index based on NSQIP data correlates with outcomes following paraesophageal hernia repair.
        Surg Endosc. 2016; 31: 2509-2519https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5253-7
        • Subramaniam S.
        • Aalberg J.J.
        • Soriano R.P.
        • Divino C.M.
        New 5-factor modified frailty index using American college of surgeons NSQIP data.
        J Am Coll Surgeons. 2018; 226: 173-178https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005
        • Shin J.I.
        • Keswani A.
        • Lovy A.J.
        • Moucha C.S.
        Simplified frailty index as a predictor of adverse outcomes in total hip and knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 2389-2394https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.020
        • Runner R.P.
        • Bellamy J.L.
        • Vu C.C.L.
        • Erens G.A.
        • Schenker M.L.
        • Guild G.N.
        Modified frailty index is an effective risk assessment tool in primary total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: S177-S182https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.046
        • Bellamy J.L.
        • Runner R.P.
        • Vu C.C.L.
        • Schenker M.L.
        • Bradbury T.L.
        • Roberson J.R.
        Modified frailty index is an effective risk assessment tool in primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 2963-2968https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.056
        • Haider A.H.
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Kibbe M.R.
        A checklist to elevate thescience of surgical database research.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 505-507https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0628
        • Clavien P.A.
        • Sanabria J.R.
        • Strasberg S.M.
        Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.
        Surgery. 1992; 111: 518-526
        • Gani F.
        • Canner J.K.
        • Pawlik T.M.
        Use of the modified frailty index in the American College of surgeons national surgical improvement Program database: highlighting the problem of missing data.
        JAMA Surg. 2017; 152: 205-207https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3479
        • Tan T.L.
        • Maltenfort M.G.
        • Chen A.F.
        • Shahi A.
        • Higuera C.A.
        • Siqueira M.
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of a preoperative risk calculator for periprosthetic joint infection following total joint arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100: 777-785https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01435
        • Kheir M.M.
        • Tan T.L.
        • George J.
        • Higuera C.A.
        • Maltenfort M.G.
        • Parvizi J.
        Development and evaluation of a prognostic calculator for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 2986-2992.e1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.034
        • Menendez M.E.
        • Neuhaus V.
        • van Dijk C.N.
        • Ring D.
        The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 2878-2886https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7
        • Ondeck N.T.
        • Bohl D.D.
        • Bovonratwet P.
        • McLynn R.P.
        • Cui J.J.
        • Grauer J.N.
        Discriminative ability of Elixhauser's comorbidity measure is superior to other comorbidity scores for Inpatient Adverse outcomes after total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 250-257https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.032
        • Ondeck N.T.
        • Bohl D.D.
        • Bovonratwet P.
        • McLynn R.P.
        • Cui J.J.
        • Shultz B.N.
        • et al.
        Discriminative ability of commonly used indices to predict adverse outcomes after poster lumbar fusion: a comparison of demographics, ASA, the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the modified Frailty Index.
        Spine J. 2018; 18: 44-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.028
        • Kapadia B.H.
        • McElroy M.J.
        • Issa K.
        • Johnson A.J.
        • Bozic K.J.
        • Mont M.A.
        The economic impact of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty at a specialized tertiary-care center.
        J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 929-932https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.017
        • Kurtz S.M.
        • Lau E.C.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Adler E.M.
        • Kolisek F.R.
        • Manley M.T.
        Which clinical and patient factors influence the national economic burden of hospital readmissions after total joint arthroplasty?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475: 2926-2937https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6
        • Kurtz S.
        • Mowat F.
        • Ong K.
        • Chan N.
        • Lau E.
        • Halpern M.
        Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1487-1497https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02441
        • Maradit Kremers H.
        • Larson D.R.
        • Crowson C.S.
        • Kremers W.K.
        • Washington R.E.
        • Steiner C.A.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1386-1397https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01141