To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

Published:February 20, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024

      Abstract

      Background

      The optimal mode of fixation in total knee arthroplasty is a continuing subject of debate.

      Methods

      Previously, we reported 2-year results for this prospective, randomized trial. Knee Society Scores, Oxford scores, and pain visual analog scales were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Minimum 5-year follow-up has been obtained with radiographic analysis for 85 patients.

      Results

      Mean Knee Society Scores and Oxford scores and patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. Each group had 1 additional revision, but neither was related to implant fixation. Survivorship with revision as an endpoint was equivalent (95.9% and 95.3%, P = .98). There was no significant difference in radiolucencies observed between groups (P = .10), all were non-progressive.

      Conclusion

      Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty had equivalent patient-reported outcomes and survivorship at midterm follow-up. Updates are planned at 10 and 15-year intervals to observe long-term modes of failure between these 2 methods of fixation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and PersonalCorporate R&D Professionals
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fricka K.
        • Sritulanondha S.
        • McAsey C.
        To cement or not? Two-year results of a prospective, randomized study comparing cemented vs. cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
        J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30: 55-58
        • Illgen R.
        • Tueting J.
        • Enright T.
        • Schreibman K.
        • McBeath A.
        • Heiner J.
        Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at average 10 years follow-up.
        J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 95-100
        • Julin J.
        • Jamsen E.
        • Puolakka T.
        • Konttinen Y.T.
        • Moilanen T.
        Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. a follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish arthroplasty register.
        Acta Orthop. 2010; 81: 413-419
        • Lombardi Jr., A.V.
        • Berasi C.C.
        • Berend K.R.
        Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 25-29
        • Parker D.A.
        • Rorabeck C.H.
        • Bourne R.B.
        Long-term followup of cementless versus hybrid fixation for total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 388: 68-76
        • Rand J.A.
        • Trousdale R.T.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        • Harmsen W.S.
        Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A: 259-265
        • Robertsson O.
        • Knutson K.
        • Lewold S.
        • Lidgren L.
        The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72: 503-513
        • Karageorgiou V.
        • Kaplan D.
        Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.
        Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 5774-5791
        • Fernandez-Fairen M.
        • Hernández-Vaquero D.
        • Murcia A.
        • Torres A.
        • Llopis R.
        Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 3543-3553
        • Hayakawa K.
        • Date H.
        • Tsujimura S.
        • Nojiri S.
        • Yamada H.
        • Nakagawa K.
        Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
        Knee. 2014; 21: 199-203
        • Henricson A.
        • Linder L.
        • Nilsson K.G.
        A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 1585-1593
        • Henricson A.
        • Rosmark D.
        • Nilsson K.G.
        Trabecular metal tibia still stable at 5 years: an RSA study of 36 patients aged less than 60 years.
        Acta Orthop. 2013; 84: 398-405
        • Kamath A.F.
        • Lee G.C.
        • Sheth N.P.
        • Nelson C.L.
        • Garino J.P.
        • Israelite C.L.
        Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years.
        J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26: 1390-1395
        • Park J.W.
        • Kim Y.H.
        Simultaneous cemented and cementless total knee replacement in the same patients: a prospective comparison of long-term outcomes using an identical design of NexGen prosthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 1479-1486
        • Toksvig-Larsen S.
        • Ryd L.
        • Lindstrand A.
        Early inducible displacement of tibial components in total knee prostheses inserted with and without cement: a randomized study with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 83-89
        • Unger A.S.
        • Duggan J.P.
        Midterm results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic results of 108 knees.
        J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26: 855-860
        • Whiteside L.A.
        Fixation for primary total knee arthroplasty: cementless.
        J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11 ([discussion; 128–129]): 125-127
        • Wilson D.A.
        • Richardson G.
        • Hennigar A.W.
        • Dunbar M.J.
        Continued stabilization of trabecular metal tibial monoblock total knee arthroplasty components at 5 years—measured with radiostereometric analysis.
        Acta Orthop. 2012; 83: 36-40
        • Attar F.G.
        • Khaw F.M.
        • Kirk L.M.
        • Gregg P.J.
        Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23: 344-349
        • Baker P.N.
        • Khaw F.M.
        • Kirk L.M.
        • Esler C.N.
        • Gregg P.J.
        A randomized controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 1608-1614
        • Khaw F.M.
        • Kirk L.M.
        • Gregg P.J.
        Survival analysis of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16: 161-167
        • Khaw F.M.
        • Kirk L.M.
        • Morris R.W.
        • Gregg P.J.
        A randomized, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 658-666
        • McCaskie A.W.
        • Deehan D.J.
        • Green T.P.
        • Lock K.R.
        • Thompson J.R.
        • Harper W.M.
        • et al.
        Randomized, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 971-975
        • Ewald F.C.
        The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 248: 9-12
      1. 15th Annual Report. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. National Joint Registry, Hemel Hempstead UK2018
        http://www.njrcentre.org.uk
        Date accessed: January 16, 2019
      2. Total hip and knee arthroplasty report 2017. Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Helsinki, Finland2017
        http://thl.fi/far/#index
        Date accessed: January 16, 2019