Advertisement

What Factors Affect Whether Patients Return to the Same Surgeon to Replace the Contralateral Joint? A Study of Over 200,000 Patients

Published:December 03, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.036

      Abstract

      Background

      Patients with hip and knee arthritis often undergo bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a staged or simultaneous fashion. However, when staged, the incidence and factors associated with having both procedures performed by the same surgeon or different surgeon are not well studied.

      Methods

      All patients undergoing nonsimultaneous bilateral THA or TKA for osteoarthritis were abstracted from the 2010 to 2020 PearlDiver Mariner administrative database. The National Provider Identifier number was used to determine whether the same surgeon performed both surgeries. Demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications after the first joint replacement were assessed as possible independent predictors of utilizing a different surgeon for the contralateral joint.

      Results

      Of 87,593 staged bilateral THAs, the same surgeon performed 40,707 (46.5%) arthroplasties. Of 147,938 staged bilateral TKAs, the same surgeon performed 77,072 (52.1%) arthroplasties. Notably, older cohorts of patients had independent, stepwise, and significantly greater odds of changing surgeons for the contralateral THA and TKA. Those patients who were insured by Medicare and Medicaid had significantly lower odds of changing surgeons. For both THA and TKA, surgical and implant-related adverse events (surgical site infection/periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, manipulation) carried the greatest odds of undergoing the contralateral replacement with a different surgeon.

      Conclusion

      Patients covered by Medicaid and sicker patients were significancy less likely to switch surgeons for their contralateral THA or TKA. Additionally, patients experiencing a surgery-related adverse event within 90 days of their first THA or TKA had significantly, increased odds of switching surgeons for their subsequent TJA.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Iorio R.
        • Robb W.J.
        • Healy W.L.
        • Berry D.J.
        • Hozack W.J.
        • Kyle R.F.
        • et al.
        Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume Assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1598-1605
        • Lorenze M.
        • Huo M.H.
        • Zatorski L.E.
        • Keggi K.J.
        A comparison of the cost effectiveness of one-stage versus two-stage bilateral total hip replacement.
        Orthopedics. 1998; 21: 1249-1252
        • Cnudde P.H.J.
        • Nemes S.
        • Bülow E.
        • Timperley A.J.
        • Whitehouse S.L.
        • Kärrholm J.
        • et al.
        Risk of further surgery on the same or opposite side and mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multi-state analysis of 133,654 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
        Acta Orthop. 2018; 89: 386-393
        • McMahon M.
        • Block J.A.
        The risk of contralateral total knee arthroplasty after knee replacement for osteoarthritis.
        J Rheumatol. 2003; 30: 1822-1824
        • Ben-Shlomo Y.
        • Blom A.
        • Boulton C.
        • Brittain R.
        • Clark E.
        • Craig R.
        • et al.
        National Joint Registry Annual Reports. The National Joint Registry 16th Annual Report 2019.
        National Joint Registry© National Joint Registry 2019, London2019
        • Kurtz S.M.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Schmier J.
        • Zhao K.
        • Mowat F.
        • Lau E.
        Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004.
        J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 195-203
        • Lawson K.A.
        • Chen A.F.
        • Springer B.D.
        • Illgen R.L.
        • Lewallen D.G.
        • Huddleston J.I.
        • et al.
        Migration patterns for revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States as reported in the American joint replacement registry.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 3538-3542
        • Illgen R.L.
        • Lewallen D.G.
        • Yep P.J.
        • Mullen K.J.
        • Bozic K.J.
        Migration patterns for revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States as reported in the American joint replacement registry.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 1401-1406
        • Khatib Y.
        • Badge H.
        • Xuan W.
        • Naylor J.M.
        • Harris I.A.
        Patient satisfaction and perception of success after total knee arthroplasty are more strongly associated with patient factors and complications than surgical or anaesthetic factors.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 3156-3163
        • Curtin F.
        • Schulz P.
        Multiple correlations and Bonferroni's correction.
        Biol Psychiatry. 1998; 44: 775-777
        • Gronbeck C.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Lieberman J.R.
        • Halawi M.J.
        Risk stratification in primary total joint arthroplasty: the current state of knowledge.
        Arthroplast Today. 2019; 5: 126-131
        • Adelani M.A.
        • Barrack R.L.
        Patient perceptions of the safety of outpatient total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 462-464
        • Holmgren A.J.
        • Patel V.
        • Adler-Milstein J.
        Progress in interoperability: measuring US hospitals' engagement in sharing patient data.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36: 1820-1827
        • Szawlowski S.
        • Choong P.F.M.
        • Li J.
        • Nelson E.
        • Nikpour M.
        • Scott A.
        • et al.
        How do surgeons' trade-off between patient outcomes and risk of complications in total knee arthroplasty? a discrete choice experiment in Australia.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9: e029406
        • Skaggs D.L.
        • Lehmann C.L.
        • Rice C.
        • Killelea B.K.
        • Bauer R.M.
        • Kay R.M.
        • et al.
        Access to orthopaedic care for children with Medicaid versus private insurance: results of a national survey.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2006; 26: 400-404
        • Lalezari R.M.
        • Pozen A.
        • Dy C.J.
        State variation in Medicaid reimbursements for orthopaedic surgery.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100: 236-242
        • Maman S.R.
        • Andreae M.H.
        • Gaber-Baylis L.K.
        • Turnbull Z.A.
        • White R.S.
        Medicaid insurance status predicts postoperative mortality after total knee arthroplasty in state inpatient databases.
        J Comp Eff Res. 2019; 8: 1213-1228
        • D'Apuzzo M.R.
        • Villa J.M.
        • Alcerro J.C.
        • Rossi M.D.
        • Lavernia C.J.
        Total joint arthroplasty: a granular analysis of outcomes in the economically disadvantaged patient.
        J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 41-44
        • Hinman A.
        • Bozic K.J.
        Impact of payer type on resource utilization, outcomes and access to care in total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23: 9-14
        • Pulte D.
        • Castro F.A.
        • Brenner H.
        • Jansen L.
        Outcome disparities by insurance type for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia.
        Leuk Res. 2017; 56: 75-81
        • Inverso G.
        • Mahal B.A.
        • Aizer A.A.
        • Donoff R.B.
        • Chuang S.K.
        Health insurance affects head and neck cancer treatment patterns and outcomes.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74: 1241-1247
        • Segal D.N.
        • Grabel Z.J.
        • Shi W.J.
        • Gottschalk M.B.
        • Boden S.D.
        The impact of insurance coverage on access to orthopedic spine care.
        J Spine Surg. 2018; 4: 260-263
        • Lakomkin N.
        • Hutzler L.
        • Bosco J.A.
        The relationship between Medicaid coverage and outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
        JBJS Rev. 2020; 8: e0085
        • Acuña A.J.
        • Jella T.K.
        • Samuel L.T.
        • Schwarzkopf R.
        • Fehring T.K.
        • Kamath A.F.
        Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for revision hip arthroplasty: study showing significant decrease from 2002 to 2019.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103: 1212-1219
        • Lopez C.D.
        • Boddapati V.
        • Neuwirth A.L.
        • Shah R.P.
        • Cooper H.J.
        • Geller J.A.
        Hospital and Surgeon Medicare reimbursement trends for total joint arthroplasty.
        Arthroplast Today. 2020; 6: 437-444
        • Nayar S.K.
        • MacMahon A.
        • Mikula J.D.
        • Greenberg M.
        • Barry K.
        • Rao S.S.
        Free falling: declining inflation-adjusted payment for arthroplasty surgeons.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 795-800
        • Bourne R.B.
        • Chesworth B.M.
        • Davis A.M.
        • Mahomed N.N.
        • Charron K.D.
        Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 57-63
        • Halawi M.J.
        • Jongbloed W.
        • Baron S.
        • Savoy L.
        • Williams V.J.
        • Cote M.P.
        Patient dissatisfaction after primary total joint arthroplasty: the patient perspective.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1093-1096
        • Patterson J.T.
        • Sing D.
        • Hansen E.N.
        • Tay B.
        • Zhang A.L.
        The James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: administrative claims vs surgical registry: capturing outcomes in total joint arthroplasty.
        J arthroplasty. 2017; 32: S11-S17
        • Tolk J.J.
        • Janssen R.P.A.
        • Haanstra T.M.
        • van der Steen M.C.
        • Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.A.
        • Reijman M.
        The influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: a randomized controlled trial.
        Bone Joint J. 2021; 103-b: 619-626
        • Wylde V.
        • Learmonth I.
        • Potter A.
        • Bettinson K.
        • Lingard E.
        Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 1172-1179
        • Kahlenberg C.A.
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Schairer W.W.
        • Steinhaus M.E.
        • Cross M.B.
        Patient satisfaction reporting after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
        Orthopedics. 2017; 40: e400-e404
        • Conner-Spady B.L.
        • Bohm E.
        • Loucks L.
        • Dunbar M.J.
        • Marshall D.A.
        • Noseworthy T.W.
        Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement.
        Qual Life Res. 2020; 29: 705-719
        • Halawi M.J.
        • Jongbloed W.
        • Baron S.
        • Savoy L.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Lieberman J.R.
        Patient-reported outcome measures are not a valid proxy for patient satisfaction in total joint arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: 335-339
        • Nam D.
        • Nunley R.M.
        • Barrack R.L.
        Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern?.
        Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-b: 96-100
        • Von Keudell A.
        • Sodha S.
        • Collins J.
        • Minas T.
        • Fitz W.
        • Gomoll A.H.
        Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an age-dependent analysis.
        Knee. 2014; 21: 180-184