Purchase one-time access:Academic and Personal
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty.Clinical Medicine Insights Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012; 5: 89-94https://doi.org/10.4137/CMAMD.S10859
- Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.The Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryAmerican Volume. 2005; 87: 570-576https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02121
- Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2007; 89: 780-785https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222
- Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States.The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008; 23: 984-991https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017
- Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 1087-1098
- Prosthetic-joint infections.The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004; 351: 1645-1654https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040181
- Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty.The Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryAmerican Volume. 1983; 65: 1087-1098
- 2-Stage Reimplantation for Infected Total Knee Replacement.Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1996; : 118-124
- Contemporary 2-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Infection with Evidence-Based Standardized Protocols Yields Excellent Results: Caveats and Recommendations.The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: 2983-2995https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.028
- Economic analysis of two-stage septic revision after total hip arthroplasty: What are the relevant costs for the hospital’s orthopedic department?.BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016; 17: 112https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0962-6
American Medical Association. Medicare physician payment schedules. American Medical Association n.d. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/medicare-medicaid/medicare-physician-payment-schedules (accessed July 31, 2021).
American Medical Association. 2021 RVS Update Process n.d. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-09/ruc-update-booklet.pdf.
- International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection.The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 1331https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009
- Complications and Outcomes Associated With a Novel, Prefabricated, Articulating Spacer for Two-Stage Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment.J Arthroplasty. 2021; (S0883-5403(21)00664-1)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.012
- Synovial Fluid Cell Count for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99: 753-759https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00123
- Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection.J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25: 87-91https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.006
- The Mark Coventry, MD, Award: Oral Antibiotics Reduce Reinfection After Two-Stage Exchange: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475: 56-61https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4890-4
- Mark Coventry Award: Microorganism-directed oral antibiotics reduce the rate of failure due to further infection after two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for chronic infection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial at a minimum of two years.Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B: 3-9https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1596.R1
- Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: S79-85https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
- Quantifying and Predicting Surgeon Work Input in Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 1188-1193https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.042
- Quantifying and Predicting Surgeon Work Effort for Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 59-62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.003
- Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?.J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 340-344https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.019
- A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: S39-42https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.070
- Medicare fails to compensate additional surgical time and effort associated with revision arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30: 535-538https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.003
- Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102: 230-236https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00776
- Average Operative Times for 1,313 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and 1,300 Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Over 39 Months Are Roughly Equal to Medicare Attributed Operative Times.J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1553-1556https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.053
- Septic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Adequately Compensated by Work Relative Value Units.J Arthroplasty. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.034