Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Short Versus Straight Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Published:October 22, 2022DOI:



      Recent studies indicate a decreased risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) for short compared to straight stems. However, the results are still inconclusive. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the rate of PFFs within the first year between cementless short and straight stem THA.


      A 1:1 propensity score matching of 3,053 THAs was performed. Two groups including 1,147 short stem THAs implanted through a minimally invasive antero-lateral approach and 1,147 straight stem THAs implanted through a transgluteal Hardinge approach were matched. The rates of PFFs and fracture patterns were compared between both stem types. Risk factors for PFFs were analyzed by multivariate regression analyses.


      The overall rate of PFFs was 1.7% in short stem THA and 3.2% in straight stem THA (P = .015). Postoperatively detected Vancouver A fractures occurred significantly more often in straight stem THA (P = .002), while the occurrence Vancouver B fractures did not differ significantly (P = .563). The risk of PFFs was significantly increased for women in straight stem THA (Odds ratio (OR) 2.620; Confidence Interval (CI) 1.172-5.856; P = .019). Increasing age showed a significantly increased odds ratio in short stem (OR 1.103; CI 1.041-1.169, P < .001) and straight stem THA (OR 1.057; CI 1.014-1.101, P = .008).


      Short stem THA reduces Vancouver Type A PFFs in the trochanteric region compared to straight stem THA, while Vancouver Type B fractures are comparable. Increasing age is a significant risk factor for both stem types, while the risk for PFFs in women was only significantly increased in the straight stem group.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Vioreanu M.H.
        • Parry M.C.
        • Haddad F.S.
        • Duncan C.P.
        Field testing the Unified Classification System for peri-prosthetic fractures of the pelvis and femur around a total hip replacement : an international collaboration.
        Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B: 1472-1477
        • da Assuncao R.E.
        • Pollard T.C.
        • Hrycaiczuk A.
        • Curry J.
        • Glyn-Jones S.
        • Taylor A.
        Revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture using an uncemented modular tapered conical stem.
        Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B: 1031-1037
        • Lamb J.N.
        • Matharu G.S.
        • Redmond A.
        • Judge A.
        • West R.M.
        • Pandit H.G.
        Patient and implant survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis from the national joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
        Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B: 1199-1208
        • Young S.W.
        • Walker C.G.
        • Pitto R.P.
        Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry.
        Acta Orthop. 2008; 79: 483-488
        • Sershon R.A.
        • McDonald 3rd, J.F.
        • Ho H.
        • Hamilton W.G.
        Periprosthetic femur fracture risk: influenced by stem choice, not surgical approach.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: S363-S366
        • Combs D.B.
        • Nishioka S.T.
        • Andrews S.N.
        • Varcadipane J.
        • Nakasone C.K.
        Does femoral stem choice influence fracture type or incidence for direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142: 3515-3521
        • Abdel M.P.
        • Watts C.D.
        • Houdek M.T.
        • Lewallen D.G.
        • Berry D.J.
        Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.
        Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 461-467
        • Dietrich M.
        • Kabelitz M.
        • Dora C.
        • Zingg P.O.
        Perioperative fractures in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior minimally invasive approach: reduced risk with short stems.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 548-554
        • Herndon C.L.
        • Nowell J.A.
        • Sarpong N.O.
        • Cooper H.J.
        • Shah R.P.
        • Geller J.A.
        Risk factors for periprosthetic femur fracture and influence of femoral fixation using the mini-anterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: 774-778
        • Christensen K.S.
        • Wicker D.I.
        • Wight C.M.
        • Christensen C.P.
        Prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures between two different femoral component designs used in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 3074-3079
        • Gustke K.
        Short stems for total hip arthroplasty: initial experience with the Fitmore stem.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94: 47-51
        • Lombardi Jr., A.V.
        • Berend K.R.
        • Ng V.Y.
        Stubby stems: good things come in small packages.
        Orthopedics. 2011; 34: e464-e466
        • Khanuja H.S.
        • Banerjee S.
        • Jain D.
        • Pivec R.
        • Mont M.A.
        Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1742-1752
        • Molli R.G.
        • Lombardi Jr., A.V.
        • Berend K.R.
        • Adams J.B.
        • Sneller M.A.
        A short tapered stem reduces intraoperative complications in primary total hip arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 450-461
        • Nakai T.
        • Liu N.
        • Fudo K.
        • Mohri T.
        • Kakiuchi M.
        Early complications of primary total hip arthroplasty in the supine position with a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach.
        J Orthop. 2014; 11: 166-169
        • Iwata H.
        • Sakata K.
        • Sogo E.
        • Nanno K.
        • Kuroda S.
        • Nakai T.
        Total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral supine approach for obese patients increases the risk of greater trochanteric fracture.
        J Orthop. 2018; 15: 379-383
        • Aggarwal V.K.
        • Elbuluk A.
        • Dundon J.
        • Herrero C.
        • Hernandez C.
        • Vigdorchik J.M.
        • et al.
        Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B: 646-651
        • Carli A.V.
        • Negus J.J.
        • Haddad F.S.
        Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?.
        Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 50-59
        • Chen D.
        • Berger R.A.
        Outpatient minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via a modified Watson-Jones approach: technique and results.
        Instr Course Lect. 2013; 62: 229-236
        • Frndak P.A.
        • Mallory T.H.
        • Lombardi Jr., A.V.
        Translateral surgical approach to the hip. The abductor muscle “split”.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 295: 135-141
        • Pike J.
        • Davidson D.
        • Garbuz D.
        • Duncan C.P.
        • O'Brien P.J.
        • Masri B.A.
        Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17: 677-688
        • Liu B.
        • Ma W.
        • Li H.
        • Wu T.
        • Huo J.
        • Han Y.
        Incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a single stem: a retrospective study.
        J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1400-1411
        • Davidson D.
        • Pike J.
        • Garbuz D.
        • Duncan C.P.
        • Masri B.A.
        Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 2000-2012
        • Hardinge K.
        The direct lateral approach to the hip.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982; 64: 17-19
        • Berend K.R.
        • Mirza A.J.
        • Morris M.J.
        • Lombardi Jr., A.V.
        Risk of periprosthetic fractures with direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 2295-2298
        • Bendich I.
        • Landy D.C.
        • Do H.
        • Krell E.
        • Diane A.
        • Boettner F.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative complications and early return to the operating room in total hip arthroplasty performed through the direct anterior and posterior approaches. An institutional experience of surgeons after their learning curve.
        J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36: 2829-2835
        • Giardina F.
        • Castagnini F.
        • Stea S.
        • Bordini B.
        • Montalti M.
        • Toni A.
        Short stems versus conventional stems in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a long-term registry study.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 1794-1799
        • Migliorini F.
        • Driessen A.
        • Colarossi G.
        • El Mansy Y.
        • Gatz M.
        • Tingart M.
        • et al.
        Short stems for total hip replacement among middle-aged patients.
        Int Orthop. 2020; 44: 847-855
        • Gromov K.
        • Bersang A.
        • Nielsen C.S.
        • Kallemose T.
        • Husted H.
        • Troelsen A.
        Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component.
        Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B: 451-457
        • Malek I.A.
        • Royce G.
        • Bhatti S.U.
        • Whittaker J.P.
        • Phillips S.P.
        • Wilson I.R.
        • et al.
        A comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty: the role of an ‘Enhanced Recovery’ pathway.
        Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 754-760
        • Park K.J.
        • Menendez M.E.
        • Barnes C.L.
        Perioperative periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 992-995
        • Sidler-Maier C.C.
        • Waddell J.P.
        Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.
        Int Orthop. 2015; 39: 1673-1682
        • Hartford J.M.
        • Knowles S.B.
        Risk factors for perioperative femoral fractures: cementless femoral implants and the direct anterior approach using a fracture table.
        J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31: 2013-2018
        • Sheth N.P.
        • Brown N.M.
        • Moric M.
        • Berger R.A.
        • Della Valle C.J.
        Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28: 286-291
        • Gkagkalis G.
        • Goetti P.
        • Mai S.
        • Meinecke I.
        • Helmy N.
        • Bosson D.
        • et al.
        Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.
        BMC Geriatr. 2019; 19: 112